Pulling the goaltender early nearly left Patrick Roy watching a playoff game end with a puck sliding into an abandoned net. Colorado trailed Minnesota by one in their April 2014 series opener. With 3:01 remaining, Roy brought Semyon Varlamov to the bench.
Then Erik Johnson had to chase down disaster.
According to Pat Graham’s Associated Press account, Johnson reached the puck before it crossed the goal line and knocked it away. His scramble dislodged the net. Minnesota’s Matt Cooke followed with a shot while Johnson lay in front of the crease, triggering pushing and shoving.
That close call explains why an early pull can make a building hold its breath. One lost battle leaves the opponent shooting at open mesh. Keeping the goalie home, though, carries its own cost: another shift can vanish without a dangerous chance.
The coach must decide how much attacking time he can afford to surrender. Does he wait for the familiar final-minute scramble, or give his best players enough runway to build something better?
What the Numbers Actually Say About an Earlier Pull
A trailing team needs a goal. Protecting the existing score until the horn offers nothing in the standings.
Pulling the goaltender early accepts that urgency. Allowing another goal hurts, but failing to score already guarantees defeat. Getting burned for an empty-netter does not automatically mean the coach chose badly.
In her 2020 Hockey Graphs analysis, Meghan Hall examined regular-season games from 2013–14 through the March 2020 pause. Teams facing one-goal deficits succeeded after a pull around 15 percent of the time in the later seasons studied.
Success meant reaching overtime or winning in regulation. That figure combined different pull times; it did not isolate attempts beginning before the two-minute mark. Successful outcomes tended to involve earlier pulls, but that association cannot establish how much an earlier decision improved the odds.
Waiting Carries a Measurable Cost
David Beaudoin and Tim Swartz’s Strategies for Pulling the Goalie in Hockey tested the decision through simulations using 2007–08 NHL data.
For a road team trailing by one with three minutes remaining at five-on-five, pulling immediately produced approximately 0.253 expected standings points. The conventional strategy, generally waiting until one minute remained when down one, produced about 0.205.
That amounts to roughly 24 percent more expected points, rather than a 24-percentage-point increase in win probability.
For a home team trailing by two with six minutes left, the best tested strategy yielded approximately 0.080 expected points, compared with 0.051 under conventional timing. Those historical simulations show how waiting can hurt under the model’s assumptions. They do not prescribe an exact pull time for every modern matchup.
Former NHL assistant Dan Lambert cited analytics favoring a 2½-minute pull over the final minute when trailing by one in January 2026.
Roy had already shown how uncomfortable those extra seconds could become.
Roy Bought Time and Johnson Kept It Alive
After Johnson rescued Colorado’s empty net, Paul Stastny tied the game with 13.4 seconds remaining. He scored again 7:27 into overtime to complete a 5–4 Avalanche victory.
Roy later acknowledged that he had considered acting sooner.
“Almost did it at four minutes,” he told reporters.
Pulling the goaltender early bought Colorado time, but Johnson had to preserve it before Stastny could deliver the finish.
A different bounce could have produced an empty-net goal and an ugly postgame debate. Roy would still have deserved a judgment based on the choices available when he made the call.
Remembering only Stastny’s celebration makes the decision look easy. Watching Johnson race toward his own goal restores the price.
Every early pull brings that same immediate demand: win the puck and put the extra skater to work.
Win the Blue Line Before Adding the Sixth Attacker
Consider a hypothetical one-goal game with 2:45 remaining. A defenseman carries through neutral ice while opposing forwards steer him toward the boards.
A controlled zone entry lets him cross the offensive blue line and connect with support. A blind dump forces teammates to chase possession against defenders who may already hold the inside position.
The coach should read that difference before waving his goalie over. If an opponent reaches the puck first, the sixth attacker may arrive just in time to watch a shot travel toward the empty net.
Pulling the goaltender early requires communication before the opening appears. The goalie needs the signal, the substitute must stand ready, and the puck carrier needs an outlet.
Waiting a few seconds for a clean entry can improve the attack. Waiting through another entire possession can squander the advantage of acting early.
Make the Extra Skater Change a Defender’s Job
Once the team establishes possession, the sixth attacker must force another decision.
One possible arrangement places a forward below the goal line, another near the crease, and a third between the circles. Teammates higher in the zone provide outlets and shooting threats.
From behind the net, the puck carrier can threaten a short pass into the slot. A defender who turns toward him risks losing track of the attacker near the crease.
Net-front traffic gives a point shot a purpose beyond reaching the goalie’s chest. A screen can hide the release, while another stick threatens a deflection.
The next touch can decide whether the pressure continues. When a shot hits a shin pad, the closest attacker must hunt the loose puck. Teammates need to close escape routes without all collapsing toward the same battle.
Six skaters accomplish little if one defender can tie up two of them against the boards.
Fresh Legs Matter After the First Chance
The star forward leaning over his stick might still possess the best shot on the bench. He also has to reach the puck before a rested defender clears it.
Pulling the goaltender early gives a coach more attacking time to manage. It does not require stretching one exhausted unit across the entire finish.
A stoppage offers a chance to change personnel and clarify assignments. During continuous pressure, the coach must judge whether a substitution will preserve possession or interrupt it.
Those decisions should begin before the goalie leaves. A second group needs to know who takes the draw, who supports the boards, and who protects the high outlet.
Offensive-zone faceoffs demand a contingency. A clean win can start the attack immediately; a clean loss can send everyone racing back.
Fatigue makes both outcomes harder to handle. The late-game specialist needs strength to win body position and enough recovery speed to contest the next loose puck.
A famous name cannot do either job from a standstill.
Judge the Decision Before Watching the Final Shot
The next improvement in pulling the goaltender early should begin at practice. Put six skaters on the ice, send the puck around the boards, and make them solve the difficult version.
Start with a lost draw. Force a hurried entry against pressure. Have a shot strike a defender and ricochet toward neutral ice.
Those repetitions expose responsibilities that a diagram can hide. Someone must retrieve the puck, another player must provide an outlet, and somebody has to recognize when the attack has broken down.
Video review should ask equally concrete questions. Did the unit cross the blue line with control? Could the puck carrier find a pass through the middle? After the first shot, who reached the rebound?
The final score still matters. It simply cannot explain every decision that produced it.
A coach can choose a sensible pull time and watch a pass jump over a blade. Another can wait too long and escape through a brilliant individual finish.
Pulling the goaltender early demands that coaches live with that uncertainty in public. The abandoned crease makes their choice visible from the upper deck.
Waiting leaves less obvious evidence. The goalie stays home, the clock runs, and a harmless possession ends against the boards.
With three minutes remaining, the coach still has time to decide how his team will attack. By thirty seconds, he may only have time to hope.
READ MORE: NHL Salary Cap Ceiling Makes October Waiver Claims Costly
FAQs
Q1. Why do NHL teams pull their goalie early?
A. Pulling the goalie adds another attacker and gives a trailing team more time to score. The tradeoff leaves its own net unguarded.
Q2. When should an NHL coach pull the goalie?
A. The article cites analytics favoring roughly 2½ minutes remaining when trailing by one. Coaches also consider possession, player availability, and the score.
Q3. Does pulling the goalie work?
A. Hall’s historical analysis found success around 15 percent of the time in later seasons studied for one-goal deficits. That figure combines different pull times.
Q4. Why does puck possession matter before pulling the goalie?
A. A team controlling the puck can bring its extra attacker into the play. Losing possession can give opponents an immediate shot at the empty net.
Q5. Did Patrick Roy’s early goalie pull work against Minnesota?
A. Yes. Roy pulled Varlamov with 3:01 remaining in the 2014 opener. After Johnson protected the empty net, Stastny tied the game and scored the overtime winner.
