The Timberwolves’ free-throw problem survived almost everything Minnesota threw at it last season. Anthony Edwards attacked downhill. The offense generated contact. Chris Finch’s team reached the line 25.3 times per game. Then came the frustrating part: Minnesota made only 75.2 percent of those attempts, the second-worst rate in the NBA.
Now the roster looks different. LaMelo Ball has arrived to share creation duties with Edwards. Jonathan Kuminga brings another explosive body barreling toward the rim. Julius Randle and Naz Reid are gone. Minnesota spent the summer changing how its offense will function without removing the one weakness that can make a packed arena suddenly feel silent.
That is where training camp gets interesting.
When the clock dips under two minutes in a tight playoff game, free throws stop feeling routine. Opponents choose whom to foul. Coaches shuffle offense-defense substitutions. Every possession becomes a search for the weakest link.
Minnesota went 49-33 in 2025-26, two seasons removed from the 56-win breakthrough of 2023-24. The Wolves already know they can win a lot of basketball games.
The harder question is whether they can stop donating points when the games become hardest to win.
Where Minnesota keeps losing points
The strange part about Minnesota’s foul-line problem is that getting there was never the issue.
The Wolves averaged 25.3 attempts per game while scoring 118.0 points a night. Their offense could bend defenses, create contact and generate efficient looks. The problem arrived after the whistle. A 75.2 percent conversion rate ranked 29th in the league, ahead of only Milwaukee.
That weakness followed them into May.
Minnesota shot 75.1 percent across 12 playoff games, beating Denver in six before San Antonio ended the season in the Western Conference semifinals. The Wolves did not lose that series because of one statistic. Their offense shot only 43.7 percent from the floor during the postseason, and San Antonio eventually overwhelmed them.
Still, the free points never became dependable points.
That distinction matters for a team with championship ambitions.
A missed free throw in January can disappear inside an 82-game schedule. Miss two with 41 seconds left in May and everybody remembers.
Minnesota also carries an unusually obvious pressure point. Rudy Gobert shot 52.6 percent from the line during the regular season and just 47.4 percent in the playoffs. His value everywhere else remains enormous. Gobert protects the rim, controls the glass and gives Minnesota a defensive foundation few centers can replicate.
The problem starts when an opponent can turn that strength into a strategic dilemma.
Put Gobert on the floor and Minnesota protects the paint. Leave him there during an intentional-foul situation and the opponent gets to dictate where the next possession ends.
That is not a shooting-coach problem anymore.
It is a Chris Finch problem.
Ball changes the late-game math
Bringing in LaMelo Ball finally gives Minnesota what it lacked: another dynamic creator who also punishes teams at the stripe.
The Wolves acquired Ball from Charlotte in a four-team trade in June. Naz Reid went to the Hornets, while Julius Randle landed in Brooklyn as part of the wider deal. Minnesota paid heavily because Ball changes the geometry of its offense. He averaged 20.1 points and 7.1 assists over 72 games last season. More relevant here, he shot 89.9 percent from the free-throw line.
Those numbers give Finch an option Minnesota did not consistently have.
Imagine 28 seconds remaining, Wolves up three.
The opponent has to foul. Edwards draws the first denial. Ball curls toward the backcourt, catches the inbound pass and immediately forces a decision. Trap him and he can pass over pressure at 6-foot-7. Foul him and Minnesota puts an 89.9 percent shooter on the line.
That is a useful kind of boring.
Minnesota has spent years asking Edwards to create something spectacular when possessions break down. Ball should remove some of that burden.
He can initiate while Edwards works away from the ball. He can operate the pick-and-roll. In obvious foul situations, he can become the first target on the inbound pass.
The hierarchy should be clear: Ball deserves the first look when the opponent has to foul.
Not Edwards.
Not Gobert.
Ball.
That does not make him Minnesota’s best player. It simply puts the right skill in the right moment.
Kuminga complicates the closing five
Ball brings control. Jonathan Kuminga brings force.
Minnesota added Kuminga in early September on a two-year, $13 million free-agent contract after his season split between Golden State and Atlanta. Across 36 games, he averaged 12.2 points and 5.6 rebounds while shooting 46.3 percent from the floor.
Those numbers only tell part of the story.
Few players on this roster can attack an open lane with Kuminga’s combination of speed, strength and lift. Give him a defender leaning the wrong direction and he can reach the rim before the help rotates. Smaller wings get dragged into contact. Bigs have to make decisions near the restricted area.
That physicality fits Minnesota.
It also comes with a problem.
A 72.4 percent free-throw mark last season followed the same pattern as Kuminga’s 69.9 percent career rate. Every drive that earns contact therefore carries a little more uncertainty than Minnesota would like.
The issue becomes sharper late.
Picture a closing group of Ball, Edwards, Kuminga, Jaden McDaniels and Gobert. Length surrounds the floor. McDaniels and Kuminga can smother wings, while Gobert erases mistakes behind them. With Ball standing 6-foot-7 and Edwards built to absorb contact, passing lanes can disappear quickly.
Then an opponent starts fouling.
Gobert becomes the obvious target. Kuminga becomes the next question.
Suddenly, Finch has to decide how much defensive size he can sacrifice for foul-line security.
That is why camp matters. Minnesota should manufacture those situations repeatedly: two-point lead, 55 seconds left, opponent hunting a foul. Let Kuminga handle pressure. Force Gobert to screen without becoming the bailout pass. Swap one player, run it again, then change the score and clock.
Finch does not need theoretical answers.
He needs to see which combinations survive.
Edwards can solve part of it
For all the roster movement, Minnesota’s easiest path to better foul shooting may still begin with Anthony Edwards.
Edwards averaged 28.8 points last season while shooting 48.9 percent from the floor and 39.9 percent from three. His overall shooting efficiency surged, but his free-throw accuracy regressed to 79.6 percent after he made 83.7 percent the previous season.
He does not need a dramatic rebuild.
He needs his old number back.
Edwards creates too much contact for four percentage points to feel trivial. Every hard drive that ends with two free throws represents one of the cleanest scoring opportunities Minnesota can manufacture. Converting those chances above 80 percent changes the arithmetic over a season.
It also changes how closing possessions feel.
Minnesota cannot control whom an opponent fouls if Edwards has the ball. Teams will happily send him to the line if his percentage sits around 80 and Ball is standing somewhere else.
Edwards should want that responsibility.
Stars close games in different ways. Some hit contested threes. Others manipulate switches. Edwards can make Minnesota significantly harder to beat by doing something far less glamorous: walking to the stripe and making two ordinary shots.
Finch finally has options
This roster does not need every player to become an elite free-throw shooter.
It needs the right players handling the ball.
Ayo Dosunmu offers one of the clearest solutions. He shot 87.6 percent overall last season and an even better 92.5 percent during his 24 regular-season games with Minnesota. In the playoffs, he converted 92.6 percent.
McDaniels gives Finch another dependable option after shooting 83.5 percent during the regular season.
That should shape Minnesota’s late-game playbook.
If the Wolves lead and expect intentional fouling, Ball should be the first inbound target. Dosunmu belongs as the second release valve. Edwards remains dangerous because his ability to break pressure can turn an aggressive trap into a transition opportunity.
McDaniels provides another safe outlet.
Gobert should stay away from the initial catch whenever the situation allows it.
If opponents deliberately hunt him, Finch cannot afford to surrender multiple possessions before reacting. An offense-defense substitution can preserve Gobert’s value without pretending the free-throw problem does not exist.
Kuminga presents the harder choice. His downhill threat matters against switching defenses, and his athleticism raises Minnesota’s defensive ceiling. His foul shooting also gives opponents somewhere to look.
The best five players are not automatically the best five players for every final minute.
Finch has to know the difference.
The final two minutes matter most
Training camp will produce louder stories.
Everyone will watch how Ball and Edwards share the ball. Kuminga’s role will generate debate. The starting lineup will attract attention, as will the question of how much offensive freedom Finch gives his new point guard.
Timberwolves’ free-throw problem will probably look mundane by comparison.
Players will stand at the stripe after practice. A coach will rebound. Someone will count makes. The gym will sound almost empty between attempts.
Then May arrives.
Those quiet repetitions become a possession with 38 seconds left and Minnesota leading by one. Ball gets denied. Edwards catches near the sideline. Gobert’s defender leaves him and races toward the ball. Kuminga flashes toward half court. Finch has seconds to decide whether the lineup on the floor can survive the chess match.
That is why the free-throw question belongs inside Minnesota’s larger championship conversation.
The Wolves have more playmaking now. Ball gives them another organizer and one of the roster’s safest foul shooters. Kuminga gives them another athlete capable of cracking the paint. Edwards remains the offensive force around whom everything revolves.
Talent alone does not solve the final two minutes.
Minnesota finished 49-33 in 2025-26 and reached the second round. It scored enough. It defended well enough. It created more than 25 free throws per game.
The margin hiding inside those attempts remains painfully obvious.
Finch does not need everyone to shoot 90 percent.
He needs clarity.
Ball should receive the ball when the opponent has to foul. Dosunmu should become a trusted late-game outlet. Edwards needs to push his percentage back above 80. Gobert’s offensive minutes require situational management. Kuminga has to prove opponents cannot turn his free throws into a weakness worth targeting.
Those choices will barely register during a September practice.
In a playoff game, they can become the entire night.
Minnesota rebuilt its offense to create more answers. Before camp ends, the Wolves need to know whether the simplest shot in basketball still creates their hardest question.
READ ALSO: Screen navigation will decide the Timberwolves’ 2026-27 title ceiling
FAQs
Why are free throws a problem for the Timberwolves?
Minnesota shot 75.2% from the line last season despite attempting 25.3 free throws per game. That left valuable points unused.
How good is LaMelo Ball at free throws?
Ball shot 89.9% from the line last season. That makes him Minnesota’s safest option when opponents intentionally foul late.
What was Anthony Edwards’ free-throw percentage last season?
Edwards shot 79.6% from the line. He had made 83.7% the previous season.
Why can Rudy Gobert create problems late in games?
Gobert shot 52.6% from the line during the regular season and 47.4% in the playoffs. Opponents can target him intentionally.
Who should handle the ball when Minnesota expects a foul?
The article argues that LaMelo Ball should be the first option, with Ayo Dosunmu providing another reliable outlet.
