Winning an NBA championship used to buy a franchise at least one summer of peace. For the 2026 New York Knicks, it barely bought them a week.
The Knicks are not facing a basketball problem as much as a financial one. Mitchell Robinson and Landry Shamet helped New York finish the job, but both could become casualties of the NBA’s second apron. That line now punishes expensive rosters with real roster building restrictions, and the Knicks appear determined not to cross it.
Across the league, the Los Angeles Lakers are watching a similar pressure point create opportunity. Cam Johnson has emerged as a logical trade target because Denver may need to trim salary. Johnson gives the Lakers a clean offensive fit beside Luka Dončić and Austin Reaves, especially after the franchise altering Dončić trade reset the team’s timeline. The new CBA does not care about championship parades. It turns depth into a bill, then forces teams to decide what they can still afford.
The Second Apron Is Driving The Story
The second apron forces front offices into brutal choices. It can restrict trades, limit flexibility, complicate future draft movement and make every bench contract feel heavier. That is why this offseason is not just about who wants which player. It is about who can afford to keep breathing under the cap.
New York sits at the painful end of that reality. The Knicks built their foundation on Jalen Brunson, Karl-Anthony Towns and Mikal Bridges. That star core delivered a championship, but the playoffs also reminded everyone that stars do not win alone. Robinson protected the glass. Shamet stretched defenses. Those roles matter more in June than they do in a spreadsheet.
Robinson’s case is especially complicated because replacing his production is far harder than replacing his salary. The longest serving Knick averaged 8.8 rebounds in only 19.6 minutes during the regular season, then closed the Finals with a 10 rebound performance that reminded everyone why New York trusted him in the biggest moments. Players who consistently create extra possessions are not easy to replace, even when the salary cap says otherwise.
Sentiment does not solve the cap. Robinson is an unrestricted free agent coming off a $60 million deal. If another team offers more than New York can justify under its apron plan, the Knicks may have to let him walk.
Lakers See A Different Kind Of Opening
The Lakers are on the other side of the same leaguewide pressure. They need shooting, spacing and reliable role players around Dončić and Reaves. Johnson checks several of those boxes.
Johnson makes sense because his production matches exactly what the Lakers need. Even while averaging a modest 12.2 points in Denver, he shot a career best 48.0 percent from the field and 43.0 percent from three point range, giving him the profile of a reliable floor spacer who does not need the ball to make an impact. His $23.1 million expiring contract only strengthens that appeal by giving Los Angeles flexibility beyond next season.
A movement shooter who stretches the floor perfectly complements the Lakers’ system. Dončić creates advantages by forcing help. Reaves can work as a secondary handler. Johnson would give both players another outlet when defenses collapse.
Denver is not weighing a Johnson move because he forgot how to shoot. The Nuggets are trying to dodge the cap system’s harshest penalties while keeping their own championship structure intact. That is what makes the Lakers’ interest more than routine rumor traffic. Los Angeles is not just chasing a shooter. It is trying to exploit another contender’s financial pressure.
New York’s Depth Problem Cuts Deeper
The Knicks’ situation carries more emotional weight because Robinson and Shamet are not outside targets. They are part of the title memory.
Shamet is not a star, but his shooting gave New York a useful playoff option. Robinson is not a modern spacing big, but his rebounding and rim presence gave the Knicks possessions they could not replace easily. Losing either player would hurt. Losing both would thin out a rotation that just survived the pressure of a championship run.
The frustration around the fanbase is easy to understand. Knicks fans are not naive about the salary cap, but after waiting 53 years for a parade, they are not eager to watch the front office count pennies while useful players leave.
One Knicks fan summed up the tension plainly: “It’s always funny to me when a report like this comes out how people always forget a cap exists.”
That line cuts to the heart of the issue. New York can want to keep its championship group together. It can also understand that the second apron makes that goal harder than it used to be.
Keeping both Robinson and Shamet would push the Knicks past a financial threshold they appear unwilling to cross. Letting them leave would protect flexibility, but it would also make the defending champions shallower before the next title defense begins.
The Apron Era Rewards Ruthless Timing
This is the new NBA roster cycle. Great teams build depth, win with it, then face pressure to subtract from it almost immediately. The second apron does not simply punish reckless spending. It forces contenders to rank their own players by survival value.
That is why the Lakers and Knicks are linked in this moment even without being direct trade partners. Los Angeles is hunting for upgrades created by another team’s cap squeeze. New York is trying not to become the team that loses too much of its own depth.
Johnson would not solve every roster issue because the Lakers still need more size and frontcourt depth. Even so, a wing who converts 43.0 percent of his three point attempts without demanding a high usage role is exactly the type of complementary player contenders chase. If Denver prioritizes cap relief over continuity, Los Angeles could find itself in the right place at the right time.
For the Knicks, the question is harsher. They already found a formula that worked. Now they must decide how much of that formula they can afford to keep.
Forget the victory lap. This offseason is about salary cap survival. The Lakers are trying to turn the apron into an opportunity. The Knicks are trying to stop it from turning a championship roster into a shorter one.
Also Read: The Lakers Are Building Around Luka Doncic, But LeBron James Still Holds The Keys
FAQs
Q. Why do the Lakers want Cam Johnson?
The Lakers need shooting and spacing around Luka Dončić and Austin Reaves. Cam Johnson fits that role without needing heavy touches.
Q. What is the NBA second apron?
The second apron is a salary threshold that limits expensive teams. It can restrict trades, roster moves and future flexibility.
Q. Why could the Knicks lose Mitchell Robinson?
Robinson is an unrestricted free agent. The Knicks may let him leave if his next deal pushes them past their apron plan.
Q. Could the Knicks keep both Robinson and Landry Shamet?
They can try, but the article frames that as difficult. Keeping both would test their commitment to staying below the second apron.
Q. How does Denver affect the Lakers’ Cam Johnson pursuit?
Denver may need salary relief. That could make Johnson available if the Nuggets choose cap flexibility over continuity.
Calling out bad takes. Living for the game and the post-game drama.
