Gary Trent Jr. secured the biggest payday of his career immediately after posting his lowest scoring average since his rookie season. That alone made Milwaukee’s decision difficult to explain. The NBA’s continued review has turned a surprising contract into one of the offseason’s biggest salary-cap questions.
The Bucks gave Trent a fully guaranteed, four-year, $64 million deal after he averaged 8.1 points across 65 games during the 2025-26 season. He shot 38.7% from the field and 36% from 3-point range while spending most of the year as a reserve. Reuters reported that the contract begins with a $15.2 million salary.
League officials have not announced a violation. Investigators are trying to determine whether Milwaukee simply overpaid a veteran shooter or promised Trent a future reward when he accepted much smaller contracts during the previous two summers.
The Contract Does Not Match Trent’s Recent Production
Trent joined Milwaukee for the veteran minimum before the 2024-25 season. He averaged 11.1 points during his first year with the Bucks and provided useful floor spacing around Giannis Antetokounmpo.
Milwaukee brought him back on a two-year, $7.5 million agreement the following summer. Trent then declined his player option and landed a deal worth an average of $16 million per season.
That kind of raise usually follows a breakout year. Trent moved in the opposite direction.
His scoring fell to 8.1 points per game. His efficiency declined, and his place in the rotation became less secure. The annual value of his new contract is more than four times the value of his previous agreement.
Milwaukee can still make an on-court argument for keeping him. Trent is 27, has converted 38.7% of his career 3-point attempts and remains capable of changing a game when his shot catches fire.
The Bucks leaned heavily on that shooting history when they announced the signing. The team noted that Trent made 229 3-pointers off the bench during his first two seasons in Milwaukee, the most by any Bucks reserve during that span. The release focused on his production and did not address the NBA’s review. Trent’s representatives also have not offered a detailed public response to the circumvention questions.
The issue is not whether Trent belongs in the league. It is whether his recent play justified a fully guaranteed $64 million commitment.
Milwaukee’s New Direction Makes the Deal Harder to Defend
The contract arrived shortly after Milwaukee completed the biggest roster change in franchise history.
The Bucks traded Antetokounmpo and Bobby Portis to Miami on July 6. Milwaukee received Tyler Herro, Kel’el Ware, Jaime Jaquez Jr., Kasparas Jakucionis, Nate Ament and future draft assets. That deal ended a 13-season partnership with Antetokounmpo and pushed the franchise into a full roster reset.
Milwaukee continued the overhaul by acquiring Caris LeVert in a six-team trade. Trent now enters a crowded perimeter group featuring Herro, LeVert, Ryan Rollins, AJ Green, Kevin Porter Jr., Jakucionis and Brayden Burries.
Minutes will not come easily. Herro projects as the primary scorer. LeVert can create off the dribble, while Rollins and Milwaukee’s younger guards need possessions to prove they belong in the long-term plan.
Taylor Jenkins’ offense makes the fit even more revealing.
Jenkins has traditionally favored pace, spacing, early attacks and quick decisions. His teams try to push the ball before the defense sets, create paint pressure and keep the possession moving through drives, kickouts and extra passes. The NBA has previously featured Jenkins explaining the importance of pace, while reporting around his Milwaukee hiring described his preferred approach as a pace-and-space system.
Trent fits one part of that structure. He can finish a possession by hitting an open 3-pointer.
The problem is everything that must happen before the shot arrives. Trent does not consistently pressure the rim, organize the offense or create easy looks for teammates. He works best when another player bends the defense first.
That skill has value on a contender built around an elite creator. It is harder to justify at $16 million per season on a rebuilding roster that needs several players to handle, pass and make fast reads.
Milwaukee is not merely paying for shooting. It is paying starter money for a narrow offensive role inside a system that demands more complete decision-making from its perimeter players.
The Timeline Put Milwaukee Under the Microscope
The Bucks gained Early Bird rights after Trent completed two seasons with the organization. Those rights allowed Milwaukee to exceed the salary cap to retain him. Using that exception is legal.
Investigators want to know whether Milwaukee secretly promised the raise before Trent signed either of his cheaper contracts.
The timeline creates two obvious questions. Did the Bucks simply overpay a depth shooter? Or was this contract a delayed reward for taking less money while Milwaukee was still chasing another championship with Antetokounmpo?
NBA analyst Nate Duncan made the strongest public accusation in a post on X.
“Gary Trent getting 4/$64 after the year he just had is obvious circumvention and should be punished by the league,” Duncan wrote.
The sequence explains the suspicion. It does not prove the charge.
NBA teams overpay players every summer. Front offices misread markets, value familiarity and sometimes bet heavily on a rebound season. Reuters also reported that Trent attracted significant market interest before returning to Milwaukee, giving the Bucks at least some basketball justification for increasing their offer.
Outside interest still does not fully explain the final price. Trent received a long-term, guaranteed contract after his production dropped and the team that once needed him as a low-cost contributor entered a rebuild.
The NBA Needs Hard Evidence
The league cannot punish Milwaukee merely for handing out a bad contract. Investigators need hard evidence that the Bucks and Trent’s representatives arranged a future payment before submitting the approved contracts to the NBA.
That evidence could include text messages, emails, internal records or testimony showing that Milwaukee promised to compensate Trent later for accepting less money upfront. Without a paper trail or a credible witness, the league may have nothing more than an unusually generous contract.
A proven circumvention scheme could expose Milwaukee to major penalties. Those consequences could include fines, lost draft picks, suspensions for team officials and possible action against Trent’s contract. The player could also face discipline if investigators establish that both sides knowingly participated.
Nothing released publicly has reached that level. The NBA has not identified a smoking gun, while neither the Bucks’ front office nor Trent’s representatives has directly answered the central allegation.
For now, the contract remains in place. So does the suspicion.
Milwaukee must explain why a rebuilding team running Jenkins’ movement-heavy offense committed $64 million to a specialist coming off a down year. League investigators have a different job. They must determine whether the deal was simply difficult to defend or something the salary-cap rules do not allow.
READ MORE – NBA Didn’t Block Kawhi Leonard Trade, Teams Paused It Themselves, Silver Says
FAQs
Why is the NBA investigating Gary Trent Jr.’s contract?
The league is examining whether Milwaukee promised Trent a future raise after he accepted cheaper contracts. No violation has been announced.
How much is Gary Trent Jr.’s new Bucks contract worth?
Trent received a fully guaranteed four-year contract worth $64 million. It averages $16 million per season.
How did Gary Trent Jr. perform during the 2025-26 season?
He averaged 8.1 points across 65 games while shooting 38.7% overall and 36% from three-point range.
Why does the contract look unusual for Milwaukee’s rebuild?
Milwaukee already has several perimeter players who need minutes. Trent also fills a narrower role than Jenkins’ offense may demand.
What could happen if the NBA proves cap circumvention?
Milwaukee could face fines, lost draft picks and suspensions. The league could also take action involving Trent’s contract.
